I will break this down how I read it.
The PINK text means to me that , way back in our day, we had a rag-tag bunch of people who were not organized, possibly feuding, and were an ineffective fighting force. People were spread out and had differing armaments and different skills. Now that we do have several branches of the military who are experts in defending us, and have infinite resources compared to a lone individual, is there any need for a "militia"? Even when the 9-11 event happened, did we see real organized militias spring into action? And what did we see? I saw a bunch of hooligans with ranting and raving that "those people" were coming into USA and taking us over. Yet, I saw our military attempting to be organized and get ready for a next-threat event. I saw much more protection and help occur via ham-radio operators. This is a case of where Intelligence and planning using a structure was more effective. We need no militia, that is all dead in the past.
The PURPLE text means to me that we were not a land of people who were free of the king of england. That is over now.
The ORANGE text means to me that the forefathers intended to bestow upon the citizens of this newly (or about to become newly) free country (free from king of england), a way to achieve said freedom, and to have firearms was what they thought was required at that time.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The GREEN text means to me, that, all of the previous statements shall not be infringed as a whole. That the forefathers saw that all of those things were true at the time they wrote it.
But I say the whole statement is no longer true and should have been changed once America believed we were under no further threat of losing our freedom to another force. (specifically when we became free) Even in WWII , and someone educate me honestly if I am wrong, did USA need to activate an organized militia? And if Axis Powers did make it to USA homeland, how effective would my 9mm , or my friends AR-15, or my other friends 50 cal be against a tank? Or 45 tanks? Or how about a bomber with thermonuclear warheads?
Now get these groups ready , and i bet they can do more than a city of unorganized people with pea-shooters
United States Army.
United States Marine Corps.
United States Navy.
United States Air Force.
United States Coast Guard.
The second amendment needs to be revised but I do not know how.
So I say that gun ownership should be like a car drivers license. A privilege that most all can obtain. I lived well without any firearms, never used them for self defense and only a few times for hunting (against my choice). And now that I am free of my oppressive force (my bad neighbor) I do not need my firearm.
If I do something wrong, and government (who gave me a lot) asks for it back, I will give it back. Because I know that the second amendment was written for us to become free, and we are. And our armed forces will ensure that continues.
Now take away my car, and honestly where I live, I will suffer many times more than if I lose a gun.
My car takes me to a job (when I get one), and ensures I have food and connects me to people, services, places.