I didn't vote in the poll because my answer is in between the two. For one thing, I don't think aid should stop to countries like Haiti where it is to help them overcome a natural disaster. As for other countries, our aid needs to be rethought to see if it: Is effective in helping who it is suppose to help, and/or does it further our political interests? In furthering our political interests, I mean does it get us military access that we wouldn't have, access to natural resources we wouldn't have or provide us with leverage that is needed to help us get something we want. We should look at the money we give to the Middle East, African nations, and the Israel to see if it is effective.
If reducing all aid would make a dent in the deficit, I'd be more inclined to say do it, but it isn't. We don't give a significant amount of revenue brought in as aid to other countries. Unfortunately, anything that doesn't hurt to eliminate, and I include foreign aid in this, will not make a sizable dent in the deficit. The majority of our spending goes to three things; Military, Social Security, and Medicare/medicaid. The so called non-discretionary spending.
This is going off topic a bit and should probably start a thread when I get a chance, but I thought the senators and congressman on the deficit committee that voted against the proposal were cowards and did us all a disservice. The plan should have gone to congress for a full debate. There is no pain free way to ending the deficit and it is something that needs be tackled sooner than later.