65MHz-72MHz refresh rate
I believe you mean 60-75
Hz, but I get what you mean…I don't like it when CRTs are set to a low refresh rate, either.
TV's are okay because they generally have a much higher refresh rate.
Actually, the main reason CRT television sets are less flickery than CRT computer monitors is because they use an interlaced scanning mode, which means they scan every other line on each scan cycle, alternating "fields" with each vertical refresh (i.e. lines 1, 3, 5, etc. are scanned in on one refresh, and lines 2, 4, 6, etc. on the next). Human persistence of vision makes it so that this alternating pattern of interleaving lines appears as a solid, consistent picture. :3
Computer monitors (both CRTs and LCDs) are "progressive-scan" devices, meaning they scan one line at a time, thus making for a more flickery display in the case of the CRT. LCDs, on the other hand, don't suffer from this problem because each line refresh is merely changing the state of each pixel, rather than lighting it (since the light is provided from a backlight, and the LCD panel itself is simply blocking/polarizing it to produce the colors you see).
One interesting artifact you might notice, if you look carefully enough, is that on an LCD monitor, if there's smooth motion, and you track it with your eyes, you may see a bit of squishing and/or shearing, with the "trailing" edge of the animated object/scene being on the side of the display where the raster scan ends. This is again due to persistence of vision; we see parts of new animation frames being scanned out to the display, but not for long enough to really distinguish them as whole images, so they get mixed with parts of the previous frame, etc., etc., to create a blended image that's "shearing" or being "squished/stretched"…I hope that made some kind of sense. xP
As for my 2¢ on the topic at hand…I actually don't have a CRT myself, but I would kill for one if it had support for a decent refresh rate (at least 70 Hz), and were widescreen (I don't care what you say about vertical display area…I've grown used to the 16:9/10 format, and it feels weird going back to a "standard" 4:3 aspect ratio
)…yes, widescreen CRTs like that do exist, but they're insanely expensive, AFAIK…mainly geared for professional use in graphic design and such, due to the wider color gamut CRTs can also provide.