Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Adult Filter
Calendar
Chatroom
Login
Register
Furtopia | Family Friendly Furry Forum and IRC Chat!
»
the basement
»
the archives
»
web design support
»
Need thoughts on new website
« previous
next »
Send this topic
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Need thoughts on new website (Read 3242 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Lighthope
Newbie
Posts: 25
Need thoughts on new website
«
on:
May 24, 2005, 12:15:37 am »
Greetings all.
Don't know what forum, if any, this is appropriate, so I thought I'd give this one a try.
Could anyone prowl on over to my little website,
Tigers' Quest
, and let me know if the colours aren't too bothersome or make things difficult to read? I'm really terrible at designing anything, so websites aren't my forte either.
Only one link works, so there's not a whole lot to see yet. It'll get better, I promise.
Best,
Lighthope
Pearls of Wisdom - To err is human, to forgive is NOT our policy!
--== THE DOCTOR WHO AUDIO DRAMAS:
http://www.dwad.net
--== TIGERS' QUEST:
http://www.tigersquest.com
--== Everlasting Films Call Board:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/everlastingfilms
Logged
CarLOS
Hero Member
Vote Pirate!
Posts: 2992
Need thoughts on new website
«
Reply #1 on:
May 24, 2005, 12:56:36 am »
Hi,
I just recommend you reduce the contrast, drastically, of your background image.
As for the website coding, let the
W3C Validator
help
'>
Cheers!
Logged
Arbutus
Hero Member
Species: Rabbit
Also known as Sir Bunny-Face
Posts: 8322
Need thoughts on new website
«
Reply #2 on:
May 24, 2005, 03:03:11 am »
Agreed. If you take your background image into Photoshop (or even MS Paint, it works just as well), you can lower the saturation and the contrast, and also tint the whole thing darker so that your text will show up better.
'>
Speaking of the text, I hate to say it, but center-aligned body text and huge fonts are a big no-no. =:/ Ordinarily, I would say that multicolored body text is another no-no, but your color scheme works surprisingly well with itself and the background ("surprisingly" because it's quite hard to coordinate that many colors so that they don't clash big-time). So, basically, I'd say shrink all the text below "Tigers' Quest" (and perhaps even including that) by a couple of sizes, and stick with left-alignment instead of centering everything-- it'll look a lot better once you get some body text in there. (Also, you might consider moving the edges of the page in a bit by enclosing the entire body of the page in <blockquote> tags.)
I like the tiger buttons-- the way you have them set up so they only animate when you do a rollover is really neat.
'> The row of buttons, by contrast with the rest of the page,
would
look good centered (along with the title), so that's another change you may want to make.
Sorry, that was quite a bit more advice than I think you were going for.
I hope I was of some help!
'>
Logged
Lighthope
Newbie
Posts: 25
Need thoughts on new website
«
Reply #3 on:
May 24, 2005, 03:09:13 pm »
I agree that the colours are a bit off. Many thanks on that. (Doesn't help that I'm colourblind. hahahaha)
Lighthope
Pearls of Wisdom - My childbirth instructor says it's not pain I'll feel during labour, but pressure. Is she right? Yes, in the same way that a tornado might be called an air current.
--== THE DOCTOR WHO AUDIO DRAMAS:
http://www.dwad.net
--== TIGERS' QUEST:
http://www.tigersquest.com
--== Everlasting Films Call Board:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/everlastingfilms
Logged
Lighthope
Newbie
Posts: 25
Need thoughts on new website
«
Reply #4 on:
June 04, 2005, 11:10:06 pm »
Okay, I changed some of the colours and added a bit more to the website. Continued opinion would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Lighthope
Pearls of Wisdom - I wanted to be born again, but my mother refused!
--== THE DOCTOR WHO AUDIO DRAMAS:
http://www.dwad.net
--== TIGERS' QUEST:
http://www.tigersquest.com
--== Everlasting Films Call Board:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/everlastingfilms
Logged
Lavender
Sr. Member
Posts: 424
Need thoughts on new website
«
Reply #5 on:
June 09, 2005, 12:50:13 pm »
That background needs to go realy. It has both black on white on it so it whould be hard to create contrast.
The moving tigers have dissapeared and GET IT VALIDATED
Logged
Lighthope
Newbie
Posts: 25
Need thoughts on new website
«
Reply #6 on:
June 09, 2005, 04:13:21 pm »
Quote
(Lavender @ June 09 2005, 12:50 pm)
That background needs to go realy. It has both black on white on it so it whould be hard to create contrast.
The moving tigers have dissapeared and GET IT VALIDATED
I'm working on a different background.
The moving tigers are still there.
What do you mean by GET IT VALIDATED?
Lighthope
Pearls of Wisdom - We are born naked, wet, and hungry. Then things get worse.
--== THE DOCTOR WHO AUDIO DRAMAS:
http://www.dwad.net
--== TIGERS' QUEST:
http://www.tigersquest.com
--== Everlasting Films Call Board:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/everlastingfilms
Logged
Lavender
Sr. Member
Posts: 424
Need thoughts on new website
«
Reply #7 on:
June 10, 2005, 12:06:51 pm »
The W3c validator
There isnt much to do honest.
The firefox validator extention says.
Quote
line 1 column 1 - Warning: missing <!DOCTYPE> declaration
missing <!DOCTYPE> declaration
Cause:
A DOCTYPE Declaration is mandatory for most current markup languages and without one it is impossible to reliably validate a document. The DOCTYPE defines the version of the document like : HTML 4.0.1, XHTML 1.0, 1.1, ...
Solution:
Please place a DOCTYPE declaration as the very first thing in an HTML document. For example, for a typical XHTML 1.0 document:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd
">
<html xmlns="
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<title>Title</title>
</head>
<body>
... body of document ...
</body>
</html>
For HTML 4.0.1, there are several one. Here is the most typical one:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd
">
References:
W3C spec :
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.2
W3C faq :
http://validator.w3.org/docs/help.html#faq-doctype
List of valid doctype:
http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html
Choosing a doctype :
http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/doctype.html
line 97 column 76 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&DD"
and
line 97 column 81 - Warning: unescaped & or unknown entity "&ft"
unescaped & or unknown entity "&..."
Cause:
An entity has been detected (a string beginning with '&'
'>. And this entity is not known.
Solution:
Very often this is due to a link defined like this :
BAD <A HREF="
http://www.domain.com/cgi?x=123&y=456
">
GOOD <A HREF="
http://www.domain.com/cgi?x=123&y=456
">
All special characters in HREF should be encoded. "&" is a reserved character to begin an entity. (ex: &nsbp). '&' in HREF field should be encoded as his equivalent entity "&", even when used as a separator for parameters in the URL. Before to make you an opinion about this, please read carefully this page.
References:
W3c spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/appendix/notes.html#h-B.2.2
W3c CDATA:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-cdata
HtmlHelp:
http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
Very interesting:
http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/~flavell/www/formgetbyurl.html
line 9 column 1 - Warning: <script> inserting "type" attribute
<...> inserting "..." attribute
Cause:
A mandatory attribute for this tag is not defined.
Solution:
Check the definition of the tag. Look for the required attributes.
Add the requested attribute.
Sample: <script> inserting "type" attribute
The <script> tag has a required attribute type.
BAD <script>
BAD <script language="Javascript">
GOOD <script type="text/javascript">
Sample: <style> inserting "type" attribute
The <style> tag has a required attribute type.
BAD <style>
GOOD <style type="text/css">
References:
W3C tags:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/elements.html
line 52 column 74 - Warning: <img> escaping malformed URI reference
error: <...> escaping malformed URI reference
Cause:
An URI contains non-authorized characters. Or the quotes around the URI are not closed.
Solution:
Correct the URI.
Samples:
error: <a> escaping malformed URI reference
BAD <a href="
http://www.mozilla.org/one
space.html">space</a>
GOOD <a href="
http://www.mozilla.org/one%20space.html
">space</a>
GOOD <a href="
http://www.mozilla.org/one+space.html
">space</a>
BAD <a href="
http://www.w3c.org
>w3c</a>
GOOD <a href="
http://www.w3c.org
">w3c</a>
For the first example, a space should not be contained in URL. (Even if it works in all browsers...). This is described in detail in the RFC1738 (Look for Unsafe)
References:
RFC2396 - Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax"
RFC1738 - Uniform Resource Locators
A bit daunting but just look for the examples and you'll muddle though.
Logged
Lighthope
Newbie
Posts: 25
Need thoughts on new website
«
Reply #8 on:
June 14, 2005, 05:25:37 pm »
Everything works in every browser I checked. Mostly the validator doesn't seem to like custom stuff.
Lighthope
Pearls of Wisdom - shift key/ never heard of it1111
--== THE DOCTOR WHO AUDIO DRAMAS:
http://www.dwad.net
--== TIGERS' QUEST:
http://www.tigersquest.com
--== Everlasting Films Call Board:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/everlastingfilms
Logged
Send this topic
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Furtopia | Family Friendly Furry Forum and IRC Chat!
»
the basement
»
the archives
»
web design support
»
Need thoughts on new website