Well, I've been happily using Geocities free hosting for a while now.
It gives a nice short URL, a fair bit os space (15MB), really nice extra features like guest book, online informers, visit counter, the survay forum which after much bashing and general poking I got to actualy work, as well as a few other nifty little pirks, and the advert on the vershion I am using can be closed so they don't muck up the placement of everything on screen with an unwanted banner or flashy bit of tinsil advertising.
The trouble is that 4MB hourly traffic limit is killing me.
All I have on it are a few pictures. Well 1.5 MB worth of them. Which isn't a lot in JPG terms, but if someone views all the pages of my site thats over 37% of my hourly limit gone on one person! 3 people do it in the same hour and I'm over my limit, and I'm not even near finished building the site!
It's kind of painful.
So I was wondering if any of you could recomend a nice free host that alowes you a fair bit of space, doesn't stick in horrably obtrusive ads and has a much higher traffic limit and allows you to do all your own HTML work rather than forcing one of those god awful Templates on you? It sounds like a lot, but asking is worth a shot. I tryed googeling and yahoo searching for it but I turned up literaly hundreds of possable hosts and all of them so far tend to be unsuiatable for one reason or another. (low Hourly limits,/not enough file space/huge ads/tight content controll/buisness only/template sites only and so on)
I know you can't place files in Geocities and then load them up on another page using the Geocities account purly to store the files, but can you store filles on a diffrent account then use the Geocities account to load them to the page there and would that take the heafty pic size off the geocities hourly limit and onto the other hosts?
and is there a host that allows this?
Any sugestions on how to cut down on my data transfer usage would be appreciated. I've already converted as many JPGs as i can to gif, but quality drops dramaticly so it's no good for the big pictures.